do you consider this a critique of this person/political figure, or, the complicated systems that constructed, construed, appropriated, and exploited his image/identity?
throughout history? still? you?
you are using his image and his name and he is never allowed to speak for himself. (this is audio)
i do not disagree with it--it is just an interesting decision. a smart way to get your point across.
*i do the same thing* i use examples to explicate abstract systems*
yours is historical, of course. it seems a little self-righteous. but, what isn't.
i do wonder about the visuals.
No comments:
Post a Comment